<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Is This Social Media Bubble Deadly?&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatspinksthinks.com/2009/08/21/social-media-bubble-deadly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatspinksthinks.com/2009/08/21/social-media-bubble-deadly/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:49:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmine Tausch</title>
		<link>http://whatspinksthinks.com/2009/08/21/social-media-bubble-deadly/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmine Tausch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidspinks.com/?p=1041#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Quality read, I just passed this onto a fellow who was making a small research on that. And he actually purchased me lunch cause I saw it for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quality read, I just passed this onto a fellow who was making a small research on that. And he actually purchased me lunch cause I saw it for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who I Learn from Every Single Day &#124; danny brown</title>
		<link>http://whatspinksthinks.com/2009/08/21/social-media-bubble-deadly/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Who I Learn from Every Single Day &#124; danny brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidspinks.com/?p=1041#comment-263</guid>
		<description>[...] a good thing. He has a knack of opening discussions like nobody&#8217;s business, like the one on The Social Media Bubble. David has his finger on the pulse of a lot of what&#8217;s making impact in the digital space [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a good thing. He has a knack of opening discussions like nobody&#8217;s business, like the one on The Social Media Bubble. David has his finger on the pulse of a lot of what&#8217;s making impact in the digital space [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://whatspinksthinks.com/2009/08/21/social-media-bubble-deadly/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidspinks.com/?p=1041#comment-262</guid>
		<description>You liked that, huh? Always think of &quot;Dogma&quot; and the shit monster - plenty of these kicking around for sure ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You liked that, huh? Always think of &#8220;Dogma&#8221; and the shit monster &#8211; plenty of these kicking around for sure <img src='http://whatspinksthinks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Spinks</title>
		<link>http://whatspinksthinks.com/2009/08/21/social-media-bubble-deadly/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>David Spinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidspinks.com/?p=1041#comment-261</guid>
		<description>&quot;What needs to change is business mindsets&quot;

Well said. &quot;social media&quot; has always been valuable.  These recent emerging technologies have amplified its usage.  With the growth of capabilities, however, expectations have grown exponentially.

Get an umbrella, because the &quot;failure shit&quot; is coming haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What needs to change is business mindsets&#8221;</p>
<p>Well said. &#8220;social media&#8221; has always been valuable.  These recent emerging technologies have amplified its usage.  With the growth of capabilities, however, expectations have grown exponentially.</p>
<p>Get an umbrella, because the &#8220;failure shit&#8221; is coming haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8.24.09 Featured blogs of the day &#8211; Student Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://whatspinksthinks.com/2009/08/21/social-media-bubble-deadly/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>8.24.09 Featured blogs of the day &#8211; Student Bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidspinks.com/?p=1041#comment-260</guid>
		<description>[...] [The Spinks Blog] questions the use (and possible demise) of social media. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [The Spinks Blog] questions the use (and possible demise) of social media. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Spinks</title>
		<link>http://whatspinksthinks.com/2009/08/21/social-media-bubble-deadly/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>David Spinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidspinks.com/?p=1041#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Todd,

Thanks for sharing that link.  That&#039;s extremely interesting and is pretty much exactly what I had in mind.

I guess this trend could occur on different levels then right?  So what will determine the level of negative impact from the &quot;bubble burst&quot; (2= bubble -burst-&gt; 3= results)?  I guess while that trend is always going to occur, it could happen at higher or lower slopes. Sometimes these changes can take on a smoother transition, and BOOM!

Right now, I feel like we&#039;re headed toward the latter, but we shall see!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing that link.  That&#8217;s extremely interesting and is pretty much exactly what I had in mind.</p>
<p>I guess this trend could occur on different levels then right?  So what will determine the level of negative impact from the &#8220;bubble burst&#8221; (2= bubble -burst-&gt; 3= results)?  I guess while that trend is always going to occur, it could happen at higher or lower slopes. Sometimes these changes can take on a smoother transition, and BOOM!</p>
<p>Right now, I feel like we&#8217;re headed toward the latter, but we shall see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Spinks</title>
		<link>http://whatspinksthinks.com/2009/08/21/social-media-bubble-deadly/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>David Spinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidspinks.com/?p=1041#comment-258</guid>
		<description>Thanks Heather.  I agree, and that&#039;s kind of what I was talking about when I said &quot;social media is valuable, it&#039;s not value&quot;.  Those of us who understand social media concepts know that they can provide value.  Does that mean that any company that implements social media will automatically be adding value? No. That&#039;s where the issue lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Heather.  I agree, and that&#8217;s kind of what I was talking about when I said &#8220;social media is valuable, it&#8217;s not value&#8221;.  Those of us who understand social media concepts know that they can provide value.  Does that mean that any company that implements social media will automatically be adding value? No. That&#8217;s where the issue lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://whatspinksthinks.com/2009/08/21/social-media-bubble-deadly/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidspinks.com/?p=1041#comment-257</guid>
		<description>I always liked Scott Hepburn&#039;s (@scotthepburn) take on it - &quot;emerging media&quot;. Let&#039;s face it, social media has been around for years - all it has now is a fancy new name. ICQ chat rooms? Twitter. Forums? Friendfeed. User-generated content? Blogs, wikis, Youtube, etc. So it&#039;s nothing new - just a new tag.

I think where a large percentage of failings, faults, call it what you will, comes from common sense (or lack of it), mixed in with a little dollop of greed. People and companies are seeing dollar signs from early successes (as you rightly mention in the post, David). But early successes don&#039;t always mean long-term survival (I&#039;m looking at you, Betamax and Cuil).

If someone is so greedy that they don&#039;t take an analysis and project whether social media will work for them or not, then I&#039;m sorry but they deserve to fail. This goes for consultants too - if you&#039;re out to snake oil companies because you know some buzzwords, I hope the failure shit lands on you first.

Social media is here to stay for one simple reason - it&#039;s pretty much always been here since the first person said &quot;Hello&quot; to another online.

What needs to change is business mindsets - but hasn&#039;t that always been the case?

Great post, my friend - THIS is why I recommend you so highly any chance I get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always liked Scott Hepburn&#8217;s (@scotthepburn) take on it &#8211; &#8220;emerging media&#8221;. Let&#8217;s face it, social media has been around for years &#8211; all it has now is a fancy new name. ICQ chat rooms? Twitter. Forums? Friendfeed. User-generated content? Blogs, wikis, Youtube, etc. So it&#8217;s nothing new &#8211; just a new tag.</p>
<p>I think where a large percentage of failings, faults, call it what you will, comes from common sense (or lack of it), mixed in with a little dollop of greed. People and companies are seeing dollar signs from early successes (as you rightly mention in the post, David). But early successes don&#8217;t always mean long-term survival (I&#8217;m looking at you, Betamax and Cuil).</p>
<p>If someone is so greedy that they don&#8217;t take an analysis and project whether social media will work for them or not, then I&#8217;m sorry but they deserve to fail. This goes for consultants too &#8211; if you&#8217;re out to snake oil companies because you know some buzzwords, I hope the failure shit lands on you first.</p>
<p>Social media is here to stay for one simple reason &#8211; it&#8217;s pretty much always been here since the first person said &#8220;Hello&#8221; to another online.</p>
<p>What needs to change is business mindsets &#8211; but hasn&#8217;t that always been the case?</p>
<p>Great post, my friend &#8211; THIS is why I recommend you so highly any chance I get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Randolph</title>
		<link>http://whatspinksthinks.com/2009/08/21/social-media-bubble-deadly/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidspinks.com/?p=1041#comment-256</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that no one in the comment section has mention the gartner group&#039;s &#039;hype cycle&#039; model for new technologies. there is a good description and diagram on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle. basically there are five phases: (1) &quot;technology trigger;&quot; (2) &quot;peak of inflated expectations;&quot; (3) &quot;trough of disillusionment;&quot; (4) &quot;slope of enlightenment;&quot; and (5) &quot;plateau of productivity.&quot;

by this model, we are currently in stage (2), where the koolaid flows freely and all the world&#039;s problems can be solved with the new tools. the bursting bubble you describe in your post is the (inevitable) third phase, where users realize not every problem has a sm fix and/or fail to realize they are not using the tools correctly. but all is not lost - the curve does continue.

thanks for the post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that no one in the comment section has mention the gartner group&#8217;s &#8216;hype cycle&#8217; model for new technologies. there is a good description and diagram on wikipedia <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle</a>. basically there are five phases: (1) &#8220;technology trigger;&#8221; (2) &#8220;peak of inflated expectations;&#8221; (3) &#8220;trough of disillusionment;&#8221; (4) &#8220;slope of enlightenment;&#8221; and (5) &#8220;plateau of productivity.&#8221;</p>
<p>by this model, we are currently in stage (2), where the koolaid flows freely and all the world&#8217;s problems can be solved with the new tools. the bursting bubble you describe in your post is the (inevitable) third phase, where users realize not every problem has a sm fix and/or fail to realize they are not using the tools correctly. but all is not lost &#8211; the curve does continue.</p>
<p>thanks for the post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Whaling</title>
		<link>http://whatspinksthinks.com/2009/08/21/social-media-bubble-deadly/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Whaling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidspinks.com/?p=1041#comment-255</guid>
		<description>David, coming at this from a marketing communication perspective, I think you make very valid points. There are some people who want to say that every company should be participating in social media -- and those that &quot;opt out&quot; are to be ridiculed ... in public, no less. I believe most companies can find value in social media; however, that doesn&#039;t mean they all need to jump in.

Similarly, my career has been focused on public relations; as such, I think all brands could benefit from a proactive PR campaign. But, that doesn&#039;t mean all brands are going to embrace PR. And that&#039;s okay. The bottom line is that companies need to take an integrated approach to communication -- incorporating the right mix of tools to achieve their business objectives. There are lots of case studies that illustrate the value of social media in business which shouldn&#039;t be ignored. But, if a business doesn&#039;t have the resources or the desire to interact with various audiences, then social media might not be right for them. Doesn&#039;t make it right ... doesn&#039;t make it wrong. It just is what it is.

I still think it&#039;s smart for companies to integrate social media along with their other communication efforts, but that&#039;s just my opinion.

Great post, D.

Heather (@prtini)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, coming at this from a marketing communication perspective, I think you make very valid points. There are some people who want to say that every company should be participating in social media &#8212; and those that &#8220;opt out&#8221; are to be ridiculed &#8230; in public, no less. I believe most companies can find value in social media; however, that doesn&#8217;t mean they all need to jump in.</p>
<p>Similarly, my career has been focused on public relations; as such, I think all brands could benefit from a proactive PR campaign. But, that doesn&#8217;t mean all brands are going to embrace PR. And that&#8217;s okay. The bottom line is that companies need to take an integrated approach to communication &#8212; incorporating the right mix of tools to achieve their business objectives. There are lots of case studies that illustrate the value of social media in business which shouldn&#8217;t be ignored. But, if a business doesn&#8217;t have the resources or the desire to interact with various audiences, then social media might not be right for them. Doesn&#8217;t make it right &#8230; doesn&#8217;t make it wrong. It just is what it is.</p>
<p>I still think it&#8217;s smart for companies to integrate social media along with their other communication efforts, but that&#8217;s just my opinion.</p>
<p>Great post, D.</p>
<p>Heather (@prtini)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
